onsdag 22 april 2020

Dysfunktionen i systemet allt mer blottlagt.


FED köper högränteobligationer  och "räddar" felallokerad placerare, Carl Icahn varnade för en kris på högränteobligationsmarknaden för 5 år sedan.

Negativa priser på olja, negativa räntor....

Centralbankerna delar ut pengar till alla invånare.

Detta är förstås bara en del av en policy som pågått i snart 10 år:


Fyfan vad obehagligt allt detta är, desperationen för att hålla ihop systemet är tydligt. Kanske fixar dom det, bara gud vet. Varför har centralbankerna slutat att intervenera dagligen nu när börsen går upp? Det är förstås självklart om man betraktar ovanstående citat.

 Vad händer om det visar sig att ekonomin inte kan återhämta sig omedelbart efter 22 miljoner nya arbetslösa/permitterade i USA? Eller folk i gemene är skrämda och tillväxt inte återgår på 9 månader?

Vad är nästa steg? Ska Centralbankerna börja göra direkta stödköp på börsen? Skicka ut 10 000 USD till alla tiggare? Köpa upp all olja som produceras i USA för att bygga upp de nationella nödlagren (kanske en av de mer vettiga åtgärderna de kan göra nu)? 

I allt väsentligt syns dysfunktion tydligare nu än tidigare.

Should it be a surprise that stocks go straight up and then crash straight down? Which part of “record prices, record valuations, record leverage, record derivatives trading and record complexity” should investors be excused from understanding? Any outright long investor who is not waking up in the middle of the night sweating and worrying whether there will be a next leg of the bear market (despite the desperate and gigantic policy moves) is either Cool Hand Luke or oblivious.
We are not in the business of calling market turns. Why did most managers, economists, strategists and policymakers miss it? Certainly as the virus was getting underway, advisors should have been incorporating it into their thinking. Certainly as the global economy started shutting down, advisors should not have been upgrading their recession probability forecasts “from 20% to 25%” and modestly downgrading their Chinese growth forecasts “from 6.1% to 5.6%.” Maybe investors DIDN’T miss it. Maybe they actually thought that no matter what happens, the authorities want stocks to go up, and that is all you need to know.
The central bankers, particularly at the Fed, should be ashamed of themselves for fostering that belief, and for allowing the policy mix to be so skewed toward free and (overly) plentiful money. The solution is now pouring unlimited money into the boiling cauldron. MMT has come along just in time to justify everything. Not in productive ways, not in the building of useful infrastructure, not doing a better job of educating our workforce so we can grow like crazy, but just to save the screwed-up system that we have, just to hold things together. Helicopter money has made the job of active investing harder, and the suppression of interest rates by central bankers lowers the forward rates of return for everyone. You might say, “But it has enhanced the to-date rate of return.” We would retort, “That is true, but despite the artificially enhanced to-date rates of return in bonds and stocks, net debt has skyrocketed, pension plans are universally underfunded and developed world infrastructure is oriented toward political pet projects and is inadequate to support needed economic growth going forward." (Paul Singer)

"As for me, with the yesterday’s Fed announcement of unlimited QE and its “will buy or support almost anything,” along with the pending passage of a $2-2.5 trillion stimulus package, this is the end of the capital markets as we have known them. We have now entered unlimited QE and MMT where there is no escape. It is the Roach Motel all over again. In Chairman Bernanke‘s 2010 Washington Post op-ed, he argued that QE would lead to a virtuous economic cycle; therefore, the Fed would eventually be able to exit from its QE operations. I argued that once initiated, a reversal would be impossible. It would be like the Roach Motel, “You can check in, but you cannot check out.”
With the initiation of the Fed’s complete takeover and control of the US financial economy, there is now absolutely no accurate pricing discovery in the capital markets and we have entered a period of total manipulation. In light of this, the only markets I have an interest in are those where the heavy hand of government is not involved or only minimally involved. This leads me to rare commodities and collectibles. The public equity and debt markets are now nothing more than greater fool markets that are led by the greatest fools of all, the Fed and the Congress. US capital markets, RIP!" (Robert Rodriguez)

torsdag 9 april 2020

Tänkvärda ord om centralbanker


Q3 2013 Shareholder Letter

"Is it possible that the average citizen understands our country's fiscal situation better than many of our politicians or prominent economists?

Most people seem to viscerally recognize that the absence of an immediate crisis does not mean we will not eventually face one. They are wary of believing promises by those who failed to predict previous crises in housing and in highly leveraged financial institutions.

(...) When an economist tells them that growing the nation's debt over the past 12 years from $6 trillion to $16 trillion is not a problem, and that doubling it again will still not be a problem, this simply does not compute. They know the trajectory we are on.

When politicians claim that this tax increase or that spending cut will generate trillions over the next decade, they are properly skeptical over whether anyone can truly know what will happen next year, let alone a decade or more from now.

They are wary of grand bargains that kick in years down the road, knowing that the failure to make hard decisions is how we got into today's mess. They remember that one of the basic principles of economics is scarcity, which is a powerful force in their own lives.

They know that a society's wealth is not unlimited, and that if the economy is so fragile that the government cannot allow failure, then we are indeed close to collapse. For if you must rescue everything, then ultimately you will be able to rescue nothing.

They also know that the only reason paper money, backed not by anything tangible but only a promise, has any value at all is because it is scarce. With all the printing, the credibility of our entire trust-based monetary system will be increasingly called into question.

And when you tell the populace that we can all enjoy a free lunch of extremely low interest rates, massive Fed purchases of mounting treasury issuance, trillions of dollars of expansion in the Fed's balance sheet, and huge deficits far into the future, they are highly skeptical not because they know precisely what will happen but because they are sure that no one else--even, or perhaps especially, the  policymakers—does either." (Klarman, Q3 2013)



2012 letter Seth Klarman

"If economics were a hard science like chemistry, you’d mix a little of this with a bit of that and the concoction would lead to strong economic growth, full employment, rising home prices, buoyant financial markets, and low inflation every time. But economics is a soft science, and real life simply doesn’t work so predictably. Though economists might wish otherwise, economics is, at its core, behavioral.  Modern economies are too complex to be reliably modeled; their connections and correlations are lose and imprecise, the second- and third-order effects largely immeasurable the fickle vagaries of individual and aggregate human behavior utterly unknowable. Put an economist in a powerful government job and provide levers that can be pulled to start the printing presses, set reserve requirements, fiddle with the Fed funds rate, expand the Fed’s balance sheet, and deliver indecipherable communiqués, and that economist will feel compelled to pull those levers. He or she, like a monkey with a typewriter, might even give us Shakespeare (or Adam Smith) on occasion. But mostly that economist will spout gibberish, a mélange of untested and potentially counterproductive measures that unleash all manner of unintended consequences." (Seth Klarman, 2012 letter) 


tisdag 7 april 2020

Preliminary Thoughts – The New World Order

The following letter was sent by Bob Rodriguez to his friends and colleagues yesterday, as well as to Bob Huebscher. Bob Rodriguez has graciously allowed us to publish it.
Robert L. Rodriguez was the former portfolio manager of the small/mid-cap absolute-value strategy (including FPA Capital Fund, Inc.) and the absolute-fixed-income strategy (including FPA New Income, Inc.) and a former managing partner at FPA, a Los Angeles-based asset manager. He retired at the end of 2016, following more than 33 years of service.
He won many awards during his tenure. He was the only fund manager in the United States to win the Morningstar Manager of the Year award for both an equity and a fixed income fund and is tied with one other portfolio manager as having won the most awards. In 1994 Bob won for both FPA Capital and FPA New Income, and in 2001 and 2008 for FPA New Income.
The opinions expressed reflect Mr. Rodriguez’ personal views only and not those of FPA.
Dear friends and colleagues,
Though the virus pandemic has been tumultuous, challenging and with little precedence, from a capital market perspective, this market collapse was quite predictable. Capital market excesses became pervasive in ways that were also unprecedented. Zombie companies, corporate operating strategies that elevated financial risk to extreme levels and consumers who also became highly leveraged were the accepted actions of the day. Prudence was an extremely rare virtue. Many times I expressed the opinion that I thought the various equity markets were at least 40-60% over valued. Recent events would tend to confirm my assessment.
Back in 2009, in my Morningstar speech, and then after I returned from my 2010 sabbatical, I argued that, if we did not get our economic house in order, we would experience a crisis of equal or greater magnitude than the 2008-2009 period and that this would take place after 2017. With the passage of the 2017 omnibus bill and the 2017 tax cut, along with a continuation of unsound and insane monetary policies, this speculative excess period was able to be extended. We knew there would be a pin that would prick this unbelievably speculative bubble but we just didn’t know what it would be. Now we do.
Our economic and financial market systems were not prepared with appropriate “rainy day reserves” to withstand an exogenous shock. Balance sheets were stretched in all economic sectors. The shock to the US economy by the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the beginning of WW2 was more traumatic and of greater magnitude than what we are experiencing now and it would also last longer. However, after 12 years of Depression, the financial system was cleansed of speculative excesses that allowed for a financial re-leveraging of the economy to fight the war. After the carnage was over, the economy was able to grow out of an extreme leverage position. In contrast to then, this is not the case today, given that the economy is already extremely leveraged prior to the onset of the crisis. My worst fears have materialized.
Since 2013, I have been preparing for an economy of monumental excess, where debt and deficits do not appear to matter, along with Fed and other central bank monetary policies that totally distort the fundamental elements of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. With the events of the past three weeks, the perversion and conversion to a dystopian capital market and economic system is virtually complete.
As for me, with the yesterday’s Fed announcement of unlimited QE and its “will buy or support almost anything,” along with the pending passage of a $2-2.5 trillion stimulus package, this is the end of the capital markets as we have known them. We have now entered unlimited QE and MMT where there is no escape. It is the Roach Motel all over again. In Chairman Bernanke‘s 2010 Washington Post op-ed, he argued that QE would lead to a virtuous economic cycle; therefore, the Fed would eventually be able to exit from its QE operations. I argued that once initiated, a reversal would be impossible. It would be like the Roach Motel, “You can check in, but you cannot check out.”
With the initiation of the Fed’s complete takeover and control of the US financial economy, there is now absolutely no accurate pricing discovery in the capital markets and we have entered a period of total manipulation. In light of this, the only markets I have an interest in are those where the heavy hand of government is not involved or only minimally involved. This leads me to rare commodities and collectibles. The public equity and debt markets are now nothing more than greater fool markets that are led by the greatest fools of all, the Fed and the Congress. US capital markets, RIP!
Despite my having avoided 100% of the market carnage and also being profitable, I have to shed a tear for the passing of a capital market that has benefitted the real and financial economy so well for decades. In 2008, when I wrote, “Crossing the Rubicon,” I argued we had crossed over into a new economic order and system. Little did I know that within twelve short years this transformation would be virtually complete. We have entered into a far more dangerous environment where normal rules of analytics will likely not apply. When everything is essentially socialized as to risk, a return vs risk evaluation is essentially meaningless since the risk side of the equation has been truncated. Over a period of time which I cannot estimate yet, I will continue my preparation for a far different economic and financial environment. Capital deployment strategies will likely have to change from what has been the norm in the post WW2 environment. We are in a New World Order.
I hope I am wrong in my assessment, but I doubt it.
Good luck,
Bob
March 24, 2020

Twenty Investment Lessons of 2008 - Seth Klarman

Below, we highlight the lessons that we believe could and should have been learned from the turmoil of 2008. Some of them are unique to the 2008 melt-down; others, which could have been drawn from general market observation over the past several decades, were certainly reinforced last year. Shockingly, virtually all of these lessons were either never learned or else were immediately forgotten by most market participants.
Twenty Investment Lessons of 2008
  1. Things that have never happened before are bound to occur with some regularity. You must always be prepared for the unexpected, including sudden, sharp downward swings in markets and the economy. Whatever adverse scenario you can contemplate, reality can be far worse.
  2. When excesses such as lax lending standards become widespread and persist for some time, people are lulled into a false sense of security, creating an even more dangerous situation. In some cases, excesses migrate beyond regional or national borders, raising the ante for investors and governments. These excesses will eventually end, triggering a crisis at least in proportion to the degree of the excesses. Correlations between asset classes may be surprisingly high when leverage rapidly unwinds.
  3. Nowhere does it say that investors should strive to make every last dollar of potential profit; consideration of risk must never take a backseat to return. Conservative positioning entering a crisis is crucial: it enables one to maintain long-term oriented, clear thinking, and to focus on new opportunities while others are distracted or even forced to sell. Portfolio hedges must be in place before a crisis hits. One cannot reliably or affordably increase or replace hedges that are rolling off during a financial crisis.
  4. Risk is not inherent in an investment; it is always relative to the price paid. Uncertainty is not the same as risk. Indeed, when great uncertainty – such as in the fall of 2008 – drives securities prices to especially low levels, they often become less risky investments.
  5. Do not trust financial market risk models. Reality is always too complex to be accurately modeled. Attention to risk must be a 24/7/365 obsession, with people – not computers – assessing and reassessing the risk environment in real time. Despite the predilection of some analysts to model the financial markets using sophisticated mathematics, the markets are governed by behavioral science, not physical science.
  6. Do not accept principal risk while investing short-term cash: the greedy effort to earn a few extra basis points of yield inevitably leads to the incurrence of greater risk, which increases the likelihood of losses and severe illiquidity at precisely the moment when cash is needed to cover expenses, to meet commitments, or to make compelling long-term investments.
  7. The latest trade of a security creates a dangerous illusion that its market price approximates its true value. This mirage is especially dangerous during periods of market exuberance. The concept of “private market value” as an anchor to the proper valuation of a business can also be greatly skewed during ebullient times and should always be considered with a healthy degree of skepticism.
  8. A broad and flexible investment approach is essential during a crisis. Opportunities can be vast, ephemeral, and dispersed through various sectors and markets. Rigid silos can be an enormous disadvantage at such times.
  9. You must buy on the way down. There is far more volume on the way down than on the way back up, and far less competition among buyers. It is almost always better to be too early than too late, but you must be prepared for price markdowns on what you buy.
  10. Financial innovation can be highly dangerous, though almost no one will tell you this. New financial products are typically  created for sunny days and are almost never stress-tested for stormy weather. Securitization is an area that almost perfectly fits this description; markets for securitized assets such as subprime mortgages completely collapsed in 2008 and have not fully recovered. Ironically, the government is eager to restore the securitization markets back to their pre-collapse stature.
  11. Ratings agencies are highly conflicted, unimaginative dupes. They are blissfully unaware of adverse selection and moral hazard. Investors should never trust them.
  12. Be sure that you are well compensated for illiquidity – especially illiquidity without control – because it can create particularly high opportunity costs.
  13. At equal returns, public investments are generally superior to private investments not only because they are more liquid but also because amidst distress, public markets are more likely than private ones to offer attractive opportunities to average down.
  14. Beware leverage in all its forms. Borrowers – individual, corporate, or government – should always match fund their liabilities against the duration of their assets. Borrowers must always remember that capital markets can be extremely fickle, and that it is never safe to assume a maturing loan can be rolled over. Even if you are unleveraged, the leverage employed by others can drive dramatic price and valuation swings; sudden unavailability of leverage in the economy may trigger an economic downturn.
  15. Many LBOs are man-made disasters. When the price paid is excessive, the equity portion of an LBO is really an out-of-the-money call option. Many fiduciaries placed large amounts of the capital under their stewardship into such options in 2006 and 2007.
  16. Financial stocks are particularly risky. Banking, in particular, is a highly lever- aged, extremely competitive, and challenging business. A major European bank recently announced the goal of achieving a 20% return on equity (ROE) within several years. Unfortunately, ROE is highly dependent on absolute yields, yield spreads, maintaining adequate loan loss reserves, and the amount of leverage used. What is the bank’s management to do if it cannot readily get to 20%? Leverage up? Hold riskier assets? Ignore the risk of loss? In some ways, for a major financial institution even to have a ROE goal is to court disaster.
  17. Having clients with a long-term orientation is crucial. Nothing else is as important to the success of an investment firm.
  18. When a government official says a problem has been “contained,” pay no attention.
  19. The government – the ultimate short- term-oriented player – cannot withstand much pain in the economy or the financial markets. Bailouts and rescues are likely to occur, though not with sufficient predictability for investors to comfortably take advantage. The government will take enormous risks in such interventions, especially if the expenses can be conveniently deferred to the future. Some of the price-tag is in the form of back- stops and guarantees, whose cost is almost impossible to determine.
  20. Almost no one will accept responsibility for his or her role in precipitating a crisis: not leveraged speculators, not willfully blind leaders of financial institutions, and certainly not regulators, government officials, ratings agencies or politicians.

Below, we itemize some of the quite different lessons investors seem to have learned as of late 2009 – false lessons, we believe. To not only learn but also effectively implement investment lessons requires a disciplined, often contrary, and long-term-oriented investment approach. It requires a resolute focus on risk aversion rather than maximizing immediate returns, as well as an understanding of history, a sense of financial market cycles, and, at times, extraordinary patience.

False Lessons
  1. There are no long-term lessons – ever.
  2. Bad things happen, but really bad things do not. Do buy the dips, especially the lowest quality securities when they come under pressure, because declines will quickly be reversed.
  3. There is no amount of bad news that the markets cannot see past.
  4. If you’ve just stared into the abyss, quickly forget it: the lessons of history can only hold you back.
  5. Excess capacity in people, machines, or property will be quickly absorbed.
  6. Markets need not be in sync with one another. Simultaneously, the bond market can be priced for sustained tough times, the equity market for a strong recovery, and gold for high inflation. Such an apparent disconnect is indefinitely sustainable.
  7. In a crisis, stocks of financial companies are great investments, because the tide is bound to turn. Massive losses on bad loans and soured investments are irrelevant to value; improving trends and future prospects are what matter, regardless of whether profits will have to be used to cover loan losses and equity shortfalls for years to come.
  8. The government can reasonably rely on debt ratings when it forms programs to lend money to buyers of otherwise unattractive debt instruments.
  9. The government can indefinitely control both short-term and long-term interest rates.
  10. The government can always rescue the markets or interfere with contract law whenever it deems convenient with little or no apparent cost. (Investors believe this now and, worse still, the government believes it as well. We are probably doomed to a lasting legacy of government tampering with financial markets and the economy, which is likely to create the mother of all moral hazards. The government is blissfully unaware of the wisdom of Friedrich Hayek: “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”)


lördag 24 mars 2018

Frank K Martin och Vito Maida senaste tankar.

https://cornucopia.cornubot.se/2018/03/var-sjatte-amerikanskt-borsbolag-kan.html

"16% av alla börsbolag på de amerikanska börserna är sk zombieföretag. De kan inte betala räntorna på sina skulder utifrån ens sin vinst före skatter, ränta, avskrivningar och amorteringar (EBITDA), eller om man så vill ungefär kassaflödet. Så dåliga siffror har man tidigare sett efter IT-kraschen eller finanskrisen. Inte före när allt ska vara guld och gröna skogar." (Lars Wilderäng)


(https://twitter.com/OccupyWisdom/status/977332175258337280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcornucopia.cornubot.se%2F2018%2F03%2Fvar-sjatte-amerikanskt-borsbolag-kan.html&tfw_creator=Cornubot&tfw_site=Cornubot)

Vito Maidas, PCM 2017-12

"After several years of smooth and steady increases, equity markets provided a very small dose of realism over the past several weeks. Markets dropped on several days as investors became concerned about rising interest rates. While the headlines were quite dramatic, the declines were small in percentage terms and the markets quickly made up most of their losses. Given the extreme levels of overvaluation, these drops are not nearly enough to put companies that meet our standards for value and quality into our buy range.

 The recent market volatility highlights the risk posed by the rush into passive investments and automated trading strategies. These strategies are very similar to the elements that resulted in 1987’s market crash. Back then, institutional investors believed that they each had a proprietary computerized system that would automatically get them out of the market once it started to go down. What they didn’t realize was that everybody else had a similar program. When the market turned negative, all of the programs were activated at the same time. It was like a herd of elephants trying to get through a very small door. The result was Black Monday; a one day drop in equity prices of 25%.

Today’s passive investment and automated strategies have the potential to cause such an event again. The difference this time is that the dollars are substantially larger and the computers faster and more powerful. Should an exogenous event such as a political or geopolitical crisis materialize, these strategies and/or programs could be the “accelerant on the fire”. "


Frank K Martins brev till investerare för 2017 (min fetstil)

"The fiscal and monetary policy remedies that began in 2008 to prevent a repeat of the 1930s achieved their stopgap measures, at least temporarily. The subsequent compounding of mispricings, malinvestments, and other distortions—to say nothing of substandard economic performance and growing instability—leaves us wondering whether the tin can of inevitable consequences was simply kicked down the road. Returning to Hayek, we think it not totally unreasonable that the post-2008 intervention may ultimately be remembered as an “undisputed failure.”

(...)  Further, while consumers are spending more, they also are spending more than they have! Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics data show that the average U.S. household spent 94% of its 2017 annual income on consumer goods (including medical expenses) and spent another 10% servicing debt—mortgage and consumer. The math looks odd, because the resulting expenditures (104%) exceed total income. Considering the 2.4% savings rate, households outspent their incomes by 6.4%. (Does this sound like any federal government you know?!) That excess was satisfied by consumer-credit expansion of $551 billion. Comparatively, GDP grew by $513 billion. Positive consumer sentiment can only drive sustainable economic growth if consumers have sufficient funds to maintain spending. Whatever growth we see in consumer spending today has largely been bought on credit that must be repaid tomorrow. Sadly, as noted parenthetically above, profligate Uncle Sam has not set a good example.

(...)These are just samples of the problems in the universe of exchange-traded products, but even more complicated versions exist. Exchange traded notes (ETNs), for example, are packaged derivatives on futures contracts, wholly reliant on the solvency of the issuer. They are massively leveraged products used to short volatility, a profitable trade of late, but whose value can disappear overnight should volatility return anywhere close to historical levels. Such trades were typically the domain of sophisticated investors at specialty hedge funds. They are now freely available to any investor with a smartphone. This is the exchange-traded product universe.

Today’s financial markets are quite unlike those from even 10 years past. The current environment has spurred legion new products, many of which have never encountered a bear market. Quite likely, the weaknesses on the horizon portend greater flaws still out of sight.

(...) In this context, the melt-up scenario is much more plausible. Even though a record number of professional investors believe the market is overvalued, they know they’re on a short leash if they underperform for very long.

(...)Finally, and most importantly, is a sense of gratitude I feel toward you, our clients. Few investors would have passed the Stanford marshmallow test with flying colors the way our clients have, even in spite of me putting them through the most extreme test of deferred gratification. In the essay, “Why 1925?,” we quoted Ben Graham as saying that unless an investor had the fierce independence and temerity to step away from the madness in 1925, the chances of surviving the debacle of the Crash12 and the subsequent Great Depression were 1 in 100. Whatever storms may lie ahead, we ardently believe that our clients will be among those who survive and thrive. In the greater social context, they will be the ones through their eventual bid who might prevent a downward market spiral devoid of buyers from disintegrating into social and political chaos.


torsdag 21 december 2017

Sverige ett land med allt sämre framtidsutsikter.

"Nästa generation kommer inte som vi ta emot ett bättre samhälle än de själva ärvde av sina föräldrar och farföräldrar. Väljer vi inte klokt, och under kontrollerade former, riskerar vi lämna över ett samhälle med i allt väsentligt sämre förutsättningar till våra barn och barnbarn än det vi fick." (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1416615277/efter-sverige-en-bok-om-samhallskontrakt?ref=creator_nav)

"See I am not a monster, I am just ahead of the curve"

----------------

Bostadsbubblan
Nedanstående låt bjuder på högkvalitativ humor.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VylFH07T4Ew

Personligen hoppas jag på en jävla smäll och att en hel generation blir utplånad finansiellt av att fastighetspriserna kraschar. Personligen tror jag det bästa vore om systemet återställdes, även om detta skulle va en plågsam process. Dock har jag ett egenintresse i att fastighetspriserna sjunker tillbaka något, vilket förstås influerar mina förhoppningar. I någon meningar grundar sig nog delvis Sveriges problem i betydande överflöd, vilket märks i och med att diverse pseudovetenskap finansieras.




(genusvetenskap är pseudovetenskap och är man intresserad av riktig vetenskap rekommenderas Germund Hesslow.  I Germunds redogörelse åskådliggör han även genetikens betydelse för karaktärsegenskaper såsom intelligens. Detta kan förstås även kallas för "common sense", men som alla vet är "common sense not so common".)

Tyvärr för politiker framförallt signalpolitik i de flesta sakfrågor och ett bra exempel på detta är den nya samtyckeslagstiftningen. Istället för att diskutera orsaken (invandringen) till den ökande mängden våldtäkter drivs symbolpolitik kring en ny sexuallagstiftning.

Hela skiten hade varit komiskt om inte allt i detta landet varit så fruktansvärt misskött.

Det progressiva samhällsförfallet kännetecknas av små negativa förändringar som ej märks år över år, men som kumulativt leder till en starkt negativ förändring för populationen i landet. Det progressiva samhällsförfallet har tidigare drabbat järnvägen, äldreomsorgen, försvaret och har nu nått polisen. Polisen hinner idag inte utreda våldtäkter på grund av alla mord som sker när invandrare skjuter ihjäl varandra.

"En utredning som gäller en 12-årig flicka som misstänks ha våldtagits av en äldre kille i Stenungsund hade inte kommit någon vart efter sex veckor, trots att polisen hade ett namn på den som tros ha våldtagit flickan.
Och det finns fler exempel.
Tidigare i år filmade två män när de våldtog en kvinna och publicerade videon i appen Snapchat. En annan person sparade ned filmen där våldtäktsmännen syns tydligt och händelsen polisanmäldes, men tipsaren hördes inte förrän efter två månader. Männen dömdes så småningom."
https://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/kraftig-okning-av-unga-som-soker-hjalp-efter-valdtakt/

Inte ens med avseende på BNP kan situationen ansetts ha blivit mycket bättre, utan även här kan man notera det progressiva samhällsförfallet. Nedan från Cornucopia:

"Eurostats statistik visar att Sverige har blivit fattigare per capita jämfört med övriga EU. Köpkraftsjusterat (PPS) har svensk BNP per capita fallit jämfört med övriga EU sedan toppen på konjunkturtoppen 2007. Detta trots Magdalena Anderssons (s) uttalanden om att svensk ekonomi går som en Volvo S90 och att vi ska vara på en konjunkturtopp nu."


I någon mening bör folk fråga sig vad det är vi ämnar göra med detta landet? Vad är det vi vill uppnå? Ska vi bara vara en geografisk avgränsning där varje individ ser till sitt eget bästa? 

Johan Westerholm beskrev situationen bra i crowdfundingen till en ny bok:



(min fetstil nedan)
"Det svenska samhällskontraktet är under förändring. Men utan någon egentlig diskussion. Vi befinner oss, inom en snar framtid, vid en punkt där vi måste välja väg, ett val där vi som samhälle måste hantera en rad målkonflikter som blivit akuta. Utvecklingen är inte ny, den började egentligen för mer än 30 år sedan men har forcerats på grund av de senaste årens okontrollerbara befolkningsökning. Vi hade, även utan migrationen 2011-2015 hamnat i denna situation förr eller senare. De senaste årens migration har bara forcerat behovet av att göra ett val för nästa generation.
Nästa generation kommer inte som vi ta emot ett bättre samhälle än de själva ärvde av sina föräldrar och farföräldrar. Väljer vi inte klokt, och under kontrollerade former, riskerar vi lämna över ett samhälle med i allt väsentligt sämre förutsättningar till våra barn och barnbarn än det vi fick." (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1416615277/efter-sverige-en-bok-om-samhallskontrakt?ref=creator_nav)
"See I am not a monster, I am just ahead of the curve"







(Parentes nedan)

Bitcoin, förmodligen den största manin sedan IT-bubblan

Bitcoin mining's energy use is reportedly growing at a rate of 25% per month. At that rate of growth, it will consume as much electricity as the US in 2019.
And by 2020, bitcoin mining could be consuming the same amount of electricity every year as is currently used by the entire world.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/12/bitcoin-consume-more-power-than-world-2020?utm_content=buffer4a665&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

söndag 5 november 2017

Vad sker på fastighetsmarknaden? Är slutet nära?


What sustains and supports the value of residential real estate is, among other things, unblinking faith. “House prices don`t fall” is not so much an economic assertion as a theological one. Our grandparents or great grandparents would be astonished to hear it. Their own experience taught them that house prices, on average, don`t rise” (James Grant, Mr Market Miscalculates: The Bubble Years and Beyond, s 160)'

Har kommit "oroande tecken" på fastighetsmarknaden den senaste tiden där man bland annat kunnat se abrupta fall i Malmö och Stockholm. Det är inga små fall utan det handlar om uppåt 15%. Dock ska det tilläggas att försäljningen varit liten och det som är intressant är framförallt den fortsatta utvecklingen kommande halvåret.

Det är alltså för tidigt att säga något definitivt och man får följa upp och se den fortsatta utvecklingen. Vid ett större långvarigt fall är implikationerna oerhörda och Sverige skulle vid ett större fall (-35%) gå in i en av de värsta, eller kanske till och med värsta krisen, sedan 1930-talet.

För de som haft ögon att se med har det varit tämligen uppenbart hur detta kommer sluta på sikt och jag skrev om detta för några år sedan:


Jag betona förstås i inlägget ovissheten och att det förmodligen skulle ta väldigt många år innan några problem uppstod. Därför är jag skeptisk till om vi verkligen skulle redan ha sett slutet nu på fastighetsbubblan. Min ödmjuka åsikt är att det förmodligen krävs högre ränta, högre amortering eller en recession för att sätta stoppa på eländet.......

Tino Sanandaji, en av få nationalekonomer som faktiskt tillför nytta till samhället, beskriver situationen bäst:

"Sverige har under det senaste decenniet byggt upp ett skuldberg. Statsskulden är förhållandevis låg på 1.200 miljarder kronor, ca 30 procent av BNP. Däremot har den privata sektorn – dvs hushållen och företagen – kraftigt ökat sina skulder så att Sveriges privata skuldsättning nu är bland de högsta i världen. Tidigare i år passerade den privata sektorns skulder 10.000 miljarder kr, en fördubbling på drygt tio år, utan att milstolpen fick någon uppmärksamhet.

Detta har skett parallellt med en expanderande bostadsbubbla underblåst av nytryckta pengar. Andra orosmoln inkluderar finansieringsgap i kommunsektorn, resursbrist i välfärden, överbelastning i vården, urgröpt pensionssystem samt inte minst det växande utanförskapet bland dem med utländsk bakgrund.
De systemrisker som överbelåning medför har uppmärksammats av bland andra riksbankschefen. Trots detta påstås att det går fantastiskt för Sverige och att Sverige har en urstark ekonomi. Anders Borg konstaterade med en zoologisk metafor att ”Sverige är nu Europas tigerekonomi”, medan Magdalena Andersson använde en liknelse från motorvärlden ”Svensk ekonomi är urstark, går lika bra och snabbt som en nyproducerad Tesla”.

Denna överdrivna bild har ofta okritiskt upprepats av pressen. Aftonbladet uppmanar sina läsare ”Lägg champagnen på is” och skriver ”Sluta oroa dig – det går hur bra som helst för Sverige”, medan Expressen tidigare har kallat Sverige ”bäst av världens ekonomier”.

Det går dock inte särskilt bra för Sverige. Tillväxt av BNP per capita har legat och förväntas även närmaste åren ligga under sitt historiska genomsnitt. De till synes starka tillväxtsiffrorna som saluförs innehåller i själva verket luft i form av en flyktingdriven befolkningsökning. Det är resurser per person som avgör länders välfärd och privata köpkraft, inte dess folkmängd. Nationens välstånd mäts därför med BNP per invånare. Trots att detta tillhör allmänbildningen och lärs ut i skolan började Alliansregeringen i smyg att exkludera BNP per invånare mått ur statsbudgeten – vilket jag var först med att uppmärksamma. Detta är ett av många tricks som används för att kamouflera den svaga tillväxten." (Tino Sanandaji)
Lägg märke till att historiskt (<1990) följde fastighetspriserna någorlunda inflationen. Sedan uppstod episoden med avsågade centralbankirer och total ansvarslöshet. Liknande graf kan ses om man betraktar den amerikanska fastighetsmarknaden.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2079803541/tio-tusen-miljarder-lanekalas-i-folkhemmet?ref=email


Att ingen politiker tagit ansvar och försökte sätta hinder för detta är så ansvarslöst och kortsiktigt att man närmast borde återinföra dödsstraffet.

Stefan Ingves var länge en röst som propagerade för reson och ansvarstagande när det kom till fastighetsmarknaden. Men i samband med att han vägrade sänka räntan började en del politiker och framförallt obegåvade nationalekonomer ifrågasätta riksbankens beslut att inte sänka räntan. Dessa individer anser att inflationsmålet bör stå över allt annat och att det är fel om man som centralbank inte maxar tillväxten (skuldtillväxten) för ett land enskilda år.

Istället för att ta ansvar och riskera sin position som centralbankschef valde Ingves att kasta in handduken, detta agerande är i mina ögon oförlåtligt.  Ingves försöker förstås gardera sig inför en eventuell fastighetskrasch med att utfärda diverse "varningar" om bostadspriserna. I mina ögon är Ingves inget annat än en tjänsteman som svek sitt uppdrag och jag hoppas innerligt att han går ner i historien på detta sätt.

Med tanke på mitt uttalande om Bitcoin för någon månad sedan så får man bara konstatera ödmjukt att timing är oerhört svårt. Fastighetsbubblan i Sverige är till skillnad från bitcoin ingen traditionell mani och därför är det omöjligt att säga något förrän fastighetspriser börjat vända ner rejält. Om man dock inte bevakar bostadsmarknaden det kommande året är man en dåre.

"Vad man ytterst bör diskutera är om utvecklingen som skett de senaste 15 år på bostadsmarknaden och i hushållens skuldsättning är rimlig? Är det rimligt att huspriser och skuldsättning ökar med 5-6% mer än inflation under en så pass lång tid, när historiskt fastighetspriserna ungefär gått likt inflationen? Är det rimligt att man kunnat belåna hela bostaden i Sverige och ovanpå det ta amorteringsfria lån? När väl de amorteringsfria lånen löper ut, kommer hushållen klara av chocken på privat ekonomin när lånet skall betalas tillbaka? Är det rimligt att amorteringstakten ligger på 148 år vilket skulle innebära att våra barnbarn betalar av det sista på de lånen vi tar idag? När blir en skuldökningstakt orimlig om en ökningstakt om 5-6% över inflationen ej är det?" (tidigare inlägg)

Ytterst bör man fråga sig vad konsekvenser blir för Sveriges ekonomi när alla är så upplånade och saknar sparande att de inte kan ta risken och starta något företag?

Frågan är om inte människor ytterst styrs av incitament och med nollräntor vad är det som verkligen uppmuntras att man gör i samhället?

Spara pengar och leva inom sina medel? Eller ska man istället "investera" i en fastighet genom att gjuta fast en riskokare i köket (du vet vem du är). Kan det vara så att tillväxten i en ekonomi kan drivas upp kortsiktigt genom skuldtillväxt (10-15 år), men att detta sker på bekostnad av felallokering i ekonomin långsiktigt?

Finally, we must question the morality of Fed programs that trick people (as if they were Pavlov's dogs) into behaviors that are adverse to their own long-term best interest. What kind of government entity cajoles savers to spend, when years of under-saving and overspending have left the consumer in terrible shape? What kind of entity tricks its citizens into paying higher and higher prices to buy stocks? What kind of entity drives the return on retirees' savings to zero for seven years (2008-2015 and counting) in order to rescue poorly managed banks? Not the kind that should play this large a role in the economy." (Seth Klarman, Q3 2012 Shareholder Letter)

"If economics were a hard science like chemistry, you’d mix a little of this with a bit of that and the concoction would lead to strong economic growth, full employment, rising home prices, buoyant financial markets, and low inflation every time. But economics is a soft science, and real life simply doesn’t work so predictably. Though economists might wish otherwise, economics is, at its core, behavioral.  Modern economies are too complex to be reliably modeled; their connections and correlations are lose and imprecise, the second- and third-order effects largely immeasurable the fickle vagaries of individual and aggregate human behavior utterly unknowable.Put an economist in a powerful government job and provide levers that can be pulled to start the printing presses, set reserve requirements, fiddle with the Fed funds rate, expand the Fed’s balance sheet, and deliver indecipherable communiqués, and that economist will feel compelled to pull those levers. He or she, like a monkey with a typewriter, might even give us Shakespeare (or Adam Smith) on occasion. But mostly that economist will spout gibberish, a mélange of untested and potentially counterproductive measures that unleash all manner of unintended consequences." (Seth Klarman, 2012 letter)